Beginners Mind
| A co-worker and I were having a chat on the 'significance' of spirituality. The conversation initially started because of my Maharaj book. He had brought up this perplexity that some East Indian people could attain such profound states of enlightenment, yet a close and intimate look into the communities of India exposes much abhorrence, abuse, betrayal and sadness (a simple reminder that we are all individuals put him back on track). This led to a discussion surrounding spirituality and a need to label onself as 'this' or 'that' or to indulge in ritual in order to achieve 'something'. We discussed the aspects of attachment and what love really was (through examining what it wasn't) and our relationships with other people and exactly what enlightenment is, or isn’t and whether one really need to be defined as ‘this’ or ‘that’ in order to achieve this state of nirvana. Here is someone who refuses to brand himself as anything other than human, refuses to be caught in ritual. Considers attachment to be absolutely ludicrous. Here is a man so un-spiritual, yet I think he is closer to enlightenment than most of the spiritual people I know. When we’re so busy talking, we can’t really listen can we? We can’t go into situations, conversations, even today with a fresh mind if we think we already know the answer(s). It’s true, isn’t it? How can we start today, free from yesterday or tomorrow if we don’t have a beginners’ mind? I realized this when I had a conversation with someone a week or so ago, talking about life. He refuted almost everything I said. As if he already had all the answers. Funny enough, he was the one who wrote about maintaining a beginners’ mind. |



Comments on "Beginners Mind"
-
Anonymous said ... (4:48 PM) :
-
I Am This said ... (6:17 PM) :
-
I Am This said ... (8:02 PM) :
post a commentIf we brand ourselves as a 'human', is there not so much more that ends up on the cutting room floor?
Interesting, the need to label, even a seemingly broad term such as being, 'a human', is so restrictive and
dualistic.
Words are so limiting ;-) aren't they. Anything produced of the thought/mind is a label, is it not? How are we to be free?
This is very true anonymous. We should investigate this. Not only the act of labeling but also our personal identification of what 'human' is. What my co-worker illustrates as being human, I may not hold that same projection as an image of the defining nature of being human. Nor do you, as clearly seen in your post. So it is speculative, isn't it? Any image produced through the mind which is translated thereafter through verbal communication is open to diversity, based on personal biases and experiences, yes?
I am discovering that most communication, when evolving around experience is as you mentioned, very restrictive and dualistic.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts :)